\"Writing.Com
*Magnify*
Printed from https://mathguy.writing.com/main/authors.php/action/reviewers
The Writing.Com members below are accepting review requests and ready to review your item! Peruse the list, check out members' review styles and request a review from anyone who seems like a good fit for your item.
Registered Author
Bill Whyte Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I'm more interested in the flow and style of a story. Does it read well, am I hooked on the story and the characters? My grammar and spelling are good, but I'm by no means an expert however, I can see some things that might get missed. I've been there, written something up and missed stupid little things.
Preferred Author
HollyMerry Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Honest and encouraging
Preferred Author
Marvelous Friend Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Honest and simple
puppetmaster84's Portfolio
Preferred Author
The Puppet Master Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I will say what I liked about your piece and if I have any suggestions for improvement. My reviews are usually short, sweet and to the point. I prefer to review short stories but will look at poetry if asked to.
Preferred Author
Amethyst Angel 🌼 Author Icon
(minimum 2,000 GPs)
Casual, friendly. I'll point out typos when I see them and make suggestions about quality, characters and logic, besides telling you how I feel about the piece.
xonereth's Portfolio
Registered Author
Xonereth Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Im happy to review most things, if it holds my interest though I will be less sloppy and more engaged.
orchidslvr2914's Portfolio
Registered Author
Imogen Elliott Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Is honest, encouraging, motivating and helpful with revisions.
dalericky's Portfolio
Registered Author
Dale Author Icon
(minimum 1,500 GPs)
I'm a casual reader. Did I enjoy the reading experience? Would I read more? I will highlight what I did and/or didn't enjoy. I do not edit grammar or spelling, but I might comment on it.
Preferred Author
Than Pence Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I am thorough. The technical aspects are important to me as much as if the story makes sense. The word "cruel" has been used before when responding to a review I've given, but in an appreciative and kind way.
felisconcolor's Portfolio
Registered Author
Felix O'Melany Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I will not give a very structured review; It will be just me typing out what I think about the piece, generally how well I think it accomplished its goals, what I think the goals are, and also generally a couple of notes on possible minor tweaks to the piece to make it slightly better.
Registered Author
LorenIsOneOfMyNames Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I'm honest but constructive. I'll explain why I give the number of stars I give and what you could do to improve that. I do fix grammar as well as look at style, emotional triggers, characters, and other things like that. I'll get back to you with a full review in a couple of days or so after the request, depending on the length of the item.
Preferred Author
LightinMind Author Icon
(minimum 2,000 GPs)
I try to be honest and positive. My Christian faith is an important background factor. I hate rating low but have a system that determines how I grade.
 
STATIC
My Philosophy of Rating and Reviewing Open in new Window. (E)
How do I assess people's work when reviewing?
#2259390 by LightinMind Author IconMail Icon
steven-writer's Portfolio
Preferred Author
S 🤦 Author Icon
(minimum 2,000 GPs)
Minimalist. Focus on technical. I also look at how a work would fit into the traditional publishing landscape. I don't use a template. Warning: I am Australian, and so cultural differences may apply.
elfmage7's Portfolio
Moderator
Dawn Embers Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Disclaimer: I am not good at remembering to do requested reviews. Often I have busy things going on with work and my own novels, so sorry if I decline or don't remember to do a review in the short time given. Just a warning. When I review: Long. Depending on the type of story and reason for review I tend to get anywhere from 4,000 characters to on the rare occasion over 10,000. I will make overall comments, technical points and even offer sources when necessary but a lot is dependent on what I'm reviewing. I can even do a full edit but that's take a lot of niceness and time.
Registered Author
Enthusiasm Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I dissect stories like a surgeon with a poet’s hands—probing the emotional marrow, not just the bones. My reviews prioritize thematic resonance, psychological authenticity, and prose that feels before it explains. I’ll ask why the rain in your story smells like regret, or how the silence between lovers becomes its own character. Technical critiques (pacing, grammar) come only if requested—I’m here to unravel why your story haunts, not just how it functions.
coolzebra's Portfolio
Registered Author
meepgra Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
When I review something, I look for grammar and it's content. I can say what you miss or what you need.
kingalex1234's Portfolio
Registered Author
kingalex1234 Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I tend to be constructive, though I've been known to be a bit too nice...at least, in my opinion. note that while I'll review anything requested, they can be a bit sloppy if I don't take interest.
jaejaeme's Portfolio
Registered Author
Just Jae Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I have experience looking for consistency. I fully believe in Keep It Simple & Succinct. *Smile*
Preferred Author
Beholden Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I have a review template that is only used for in depth reviews, usually those that are specifically requested. These will be as comprehensive as I can manage, including everything I have noticed in reading the piece. Most of my reviews, however, are more in the nature of reactions to the piece with brief notes on things I find particularly good and suggestions on dealing with any obvious flaws in the writing.
Moderator
Quick-Quill Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I have a form I use for reviews. I look for a Goal, Motivation, Conflict and Resolution. It also allows me to tell what I liked and what I thinks needs improving. In my reviews I may make suggestions by adding my take on what the author is trying to say. Purely a suggestion to take or leave as needed.
Printed from https://mathguy.writing.com/main/authors.php/action/reviewers